DID YOU RESCIND?
YOU MIGHT STILL OWN THAT PROPERTY THAT YOU THOUGHT WAS FORECLOSED!
The Federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) has, from the time it was enacted, been the sole protection to consumers of increasingly sophisticated financial products. In the last 30 Continue reading
(GEORGETOWN, TEXAS) — The Williamson County Commissioners Court was presented with the final results of the real property records audit conducted in early October by DK Consultants LLC out of San Antonio. The Commissioners were shocked at the findings, which you can access by clicking here for the full report.
Wells Fargo — the largest mortgage servicing company in the country — was recently busted for creating and sharing a handbook that instructed their employees on how to commit fraud. Ring of Fire guest host Farron Cousins discusses this with attorney Mike Burg. The WellsFargoForeclosureAttorneyManual on how to craft fraudulent foreclosure documents and its patent software program VendorScape are designed to defraud the homeowners and the courts. Shouldn’t the judges care?
If you are asking yourself ‘why are judges ruling against homeowners when they know the banks scammed them?’ Then you need to understand a judge’s most basic insight into the human condition is that it is impossible to con an honest man.* It is larceny lurking in the soul of its victim that is preyed upon. What does that mean?
The mortgage deals were too good to be true – but the homeowners believed it to be the truth… because they wanted it to be and it all boils down to making “easy” M-O-N-E-Y. Continue reading
We’ve discussed UETA and eSign and the significance of explicit consent…in most cases pre-2008…there isn’t any. Here is a Indiana case that is riveting: Good v. Wells Fargo. Read it HERE.
In this case, Bryan Good stated that in this 2008 transaction there were apparently 2 notes. Wells Fargo asserts that Good signed an eNote with a new (policy change) paragraph 11 – and that is still not enough.
Yes – go get your promissory notes and look for paragraph 11. You probably won’t see it if your note pre-dates 2008. Continue reading
This is well worth watching. Especially if you live in California – aka “the graveyard for homeowners in foreclosure.”
Fighting a non-traditional mortgage loan foreclosure (NTM) is one of the hardest and heart-wrenching actions anyone can undertake. What is even more frustrating is the inability to find a good foreclosure attorney when you need him/her.This was the case for KathyJo Torrenga, who started her family in this home. Click HERE to support the Torrenga Family.
The Torrenga’s live in rural Muskegon, MI and let’s face it, even in big cities it’s hard to find knowledgeable foreclosure defense attorneys. Good defense attorneys are few and far between and bank fraud – as we see in these huge settlements – runs rampant. KathyJo tried to defend her home pro se after searching for an attorney that could understand a complicated securitization case. Continue reading
NEW YORK – Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today filed a lawsuit in New York County Supreme Court against four interrelated companies and their principals for operating a fraudulent loan modification scam. The lawsuits were filed against Home Affordable Direct, Inc. (Farmingdale, NY), Home Affordable Solutions, Inc. (Farmingdale, NY), JR Holding Group Corp (Babylon, NY), Clear Solutions and Settlements, Inc. (Tampa, FL) and their principals, Javier Gutierrez and Shadi Soumekh. The companies and their principals are alleged to prey upon financially vulnerable consumers by claiming they can provide substantial relief from unaffordable mortgage payments through loan modifications and other forms of foreclosure prevention.
Tenacity pays off! Maybe the jig is up… This is the bankruptcy court that wanted to DESTROY the homeowner files.
“I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants Molly S. White and Ralph N. White (“White”) (“appellants”) filed this bankruptcy appeal on October 18, 2013. (D.1. 1) They appear pro se. The appeal arises from an order entered by the bankruptcy court on August 30, 2013, that determined debtors complied with the bankruptcy court’s order establishing bar dates for ‘filing proofs of claim and approving the form, manner, and sufficiency of the notice as applied to unknown creditors.” Continue reading
Washington state Pardo v. NWTS — KingCast Mortgage Movies
Deadly Clear 