Wells Fargo to lay off 638 mortgage lending employees

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

The big bank announced this week it is laying off 638 mortgage employees in California, Colorado, Florida and North Carolina, according to an article written by Hanna Levitt for Bloomberg.

The bank’s latest earnings report indicated it continues to struggle following its fake accounts scandal. Not only did the bank report a lower net income, its latest earnings report shows that although originations are increasing, it is still struggling with mortgage banking revenue.

Affected employees were informed of the upcoming layoffs on Thursday. Employees will be eligible to receive pay and benefits through Oct. 21, the company said.

However, employees unable to find another position within the company may be eligible to participate in the Wells Fargo salary continuation plan for separation benefits based upon the number of years of service with the bank, according to Wells Fargo’s SVP of Consumer Lending Operations Tom Goyda.

Read on.

View original post

THE FHFA IS A CONSERVATOR … NOT A RECEIVER, COURT RULES!

What have we been saying for at least 8 years?! Now, add this little tidbit. The HERA Act, which governs FHFA, was created by Congress AGAINST the constitutional balance of powers specifically eliminating the judicial branch. If you don’t think this was by intentional design – think again.

Just like the CFPB, judicial review is specifically exempted. Without the balance of powers, agency directors can become more powerful than the President & Congress. It begins the slippery slope to deteriorating our LIBERTY.

Congress has given Cart Blanche to the banks to steal our properties through the process of securitization/rehypothecation and MERS by the very entities involved in the creation of the overt corruption. And you can’t sue them unless you want to sue the government. How miraculously convenient?!

Another bank whistleblower case, this time at Goldman Sachs

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) was sued on Thursday by a former managing director who said the Wall Street bank retaliated against him and fired him after he complained about its dealings with an unidentified, “notorious European businessman.”

Christopher Rollins, now chief executive of BTIG Ltd, a London-based unit of investment banking and trading firm BTIG LLC, is seeking at least $50 million plus punitive damages in his complaint filed with the U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

The 2000 Harvard University graduate accused Goldman and Jim Esposito, promoted this week to global co-head of its trading business, of violating his rights as a whistleblower under the federal Dodd-Frank law, and also accused Goldman of defamation.

“The suit is without merit and we intend to vigorously contest it,” Goldman spokesman Michael DuVally said in an email, responding to a request for comment on behalf of…

View original post 45 more words

Defective Mortgages: There Is Constructive Notice, and Then There Is Inquiry Notice

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

Kelley v. USAA Fed. Sav. Bank (In re Jones), 580 B.R. 916 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2017) –

A chapter 7 trustee sought to avoid a lender’s lien on property of the debtor. The recorded deed of trust was not signed by the borrower since it was missing a signature page. The trustee argued that as a consequence the document was not eligible to be recorded, and thus did not provide constructive notice of the lender’s interests.

View original post 650 more words

Woman has her safety deposit box at BofA emptied out. Bank replies: Hey thanks for the update!

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

ORANGEVALE (CBS13) – A woman says her bank let her safe deposit box vanish. And she’s not the only one.

Susan Nomi says when she went to open her Bank of America safe deposit box of 16 years, the entire box was gone.

That’s where she kept her family’s jewelry and her dad’s coin collection.

“I was in shock; I was just like what happened to my box,” said Nomi.

She says Bank of America can’t explain where her valuables went.

“They don’t have an answer. They don’t have an answer. They say thanks for letting us know,” she says.

Nomi was infuriated, especially considering she is a retired Bank of America employee of 40 years. And she’s not alone. Others have complained that Bank of America drilled their safe deposit boxes without permission or notice.

Wendy Woo says her belongings were taken out of her safe deposit box and…

View original post 14 more words

How to Use National Settlements as Part of Foreclosure Defense

About time! Many foreclosure defense attorneys do not take the time to dissect these Settlements and Consent Orders. Certainly, many judges have never thoroughly read them -or there would be more sua sponte Orders. There ought to be ongoing prerequisite classes set up for foreclosure judges and attorneys to dissect and review these government actions. It might slow down the need for appeals. Actually, just following the rule of law would help.

The Big Lie.

It’s time for the foreclosure defense arguments to evolve. These contracts are not traditional mortgages. They are, and continue to be, securities transactions without any disclosure to homeowners. Secreted securitization is bad enough; however, hidden rehypothecation, not only from the homeowners but also the courts, is a process of wiping out our national land records and title system – an unprecedented destruction of our liberty.

Banks now want to split the mortgage and wait 20 years until the original contracts become due – so they can assert foreclosure on the property (the securities transaction) while all along risking the collateral in rehypothecation deals. A scheme where they continue to rack up debt with other people’s assets.

Now is the time to put an end to the misery of these disingenuous contracts. They were more than mutual mistake – they were frauds upon the America taxpayers, shareholders and homeowners.

Deadly Clear's avatarDeadly Clear

Can't cheat an honest manIf you are asking yourself ‘why are judges ruling against homeowners when they know the banks scammed them?’ Then you need to understand a judge’s most basic insight into the human condition is that it is impossible to con an honest man.* It is larceny lurking in the soul of its victim that is preyed upon. What does that mean?

The mortgage deals were too good to be true – but the homeowners believed it to be the truth… because they wanted it to be and it all boils down to making “easy”  M-O-N-E-Y.

View original post 2,021 more words