Fraud Vitiates Everything. US v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878)

“The moral hazard lies with the banksters’ and their cohorts’ deception and intent to deceive, the failure to disclose, the intentionally inflated appraisals and the sick and intentional manipulation of the American homeowners’ reliance for the one and only purpose of demented capitalistic profit. When you make a photo copy of a negotiable instrument or cash and try to pass it off as an original – there is intent to deceive.”

“The saddest outcome of all of this is that the judges and the governments think they are holding the country together, when in fact, by allowing this type of man-made computerized criminal behavior they are merely adding to the country’s overall moral degradation and physical decay. And for what? For pensions, retirement funds and investments that, more than likely, are not there anymore anyway? Wake up!”

There’s no difference in photocopy reductions of a Mortgage Note passed off as an ORIGINAL Note, than the counterfeiting criminal trying to copy and print currency. Nor is there a difference between a Judge accepting an obvious reduced photocopied Note instead of a wet ink ORIGINAL, than the criminal getaway driver who is an accessory to the crime. IMHO.

In Defense of “Free Houses” – Yale Law Journal

House-free (1)The authors of In Defense of “Free Houses” – Yale Law students Megan Wachspress, Jessie Agatstein and Christian Mott have taken a surface view of an extremely deep and dark lake of fraud, criminal behavior and intent.

Understanding the depth of the mortgage securities related corruption would need several scuba dives to get behind the 1990’s intentionally orchestrated criminal behavior. Researchers like Ken Continue reading