Fannie and Freddie are Back, Bigger and Badder Than Ever

Look at who was at the helm of MERS! Fannie and Freddie might as well have been Bonnie & Clyde – except in this life they didn’t rob banks – they colluded with them.

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

We learn from the New York Timesthat:

AFTER the financial crisis of 2008, there was one thing that almost everyone agreed on. The government-sponsored mortgage giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, had to go. While shareholders and executives reaped the profits from Fannie and Freddie in good times, taxpayers were stuck with the bill in a crisis. President Obama described their dysfunctional business model as “Heads we win, tails you lose.” But here we are, seven years after the crisis, and nothing has changed.

In the 2008 crisis, when it looked as if Fannie and Freddie might go bankrupt, Henry M. Paulson Jr., then the Treasury secretary, argued that their fall would cause economic catastrophe. Foreign investors, stuck with their securities, would panic, and the mortgage market would shut down. So Fannie and Freddie were put into something called conservatorship, and are now government controlled, supported by…

View original post 186 more words

Elizabeth Warren warns that evil never sleeps: GOP is trying to whittle down the CFPB

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Elizabeth Warren pic

From Elizabeth Warren blog:

The new consumer agency was about leveling the playing field, about making sure that families didn’t get cheated in the fine print on mortgages and credit cards and checking accounts and all other kinds of financial dealings.

The financial industry had fought us every inch of the way, spending more than a million dollars a day for over a year. Many times, they declared the agency dead. We didn’t have that kind of money to spend on lobbyists and PR firms – heck, we had hardly any money in comparison – but we didn’t give up. We built an organization from the ground up, and we pulled in allies and grassroots activists from all over the country. It was David-versus-Goliath all the way, and in the fight for the consumer agency, David pulled it off.

And the fight was worth it. The agency went operational four…

View original post 164 more words

Author exposes Wells Fargo in a book, available on August 17, 2015

OMG – this has to be too good to be true!

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Very interesting…

Ron Irwin completes book “Hell’s Bank” EXPOSING Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf for $38 BILLION in fines and penalties a pattern of discriminatory practices and overt racism.  Book release date August 17th2015.

 

BURBANK, CA  In his ninth book author Ron Irwin has investigated and now reports on a pattern of gross misconduct that has led to Wells Fargo & Company to paying over $38 BILLION in civil fines and penalties for a variety of severe violations of applicable rules and laws including one landmark case involving blatant racial discrimination against more than 30,000 African American and Hispanic customers.

“I find it abhorrent that such utterly disgraceful conduct of this magnitude can happen while one man, John G. Stumpf, CEO of Wells Fargo & Company receives compensation in excess of $160 MILLION.  How can it be that Stumpf receives such lush pay as his company literally destroys the…

View original post 59 more words

Judge orders massive release of Fannie, Freddie conservatorship docs

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Judge Margaret Sweeney in the Federal Claims Court in Washington yesterday granted a motion that will force theU.S. Treasury to release all discovery document materials in its possession that pertain to the decision to take Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship.

The request, made by Fairholme Funds, is a big win for them in the battle to review federally sealed documents in its case against the United States government. Fairholme is one of several former investors in the government-sponsored enterprises who say their ownership stake was illegally taken from them by the federal government during conservatorship. They are fighting, in court, to get that stake returned.

Read on.

View original post

Claim Amount: It Pays To Pay Attention

Apparently, top-notch bankruptcy attorney and honorable judge who followed the bankruptcy rules of law.

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

In re Walker, 526 B.R. 187 (E.D. La. 2015) –

The bankruptcy court (1) denied a mortgage lender’s request to file a late amendment to a proof of claim that had been filed on its behalf by the debtor and (2) confirmed the debtor’s proposed plan over the mortgagee’s objection that the plan payments were not sufficient to cure the actual arrearage. The lender appealed to the district court.

View original post 741 more words

Guidance for Judges When Considering Admissibility of Hearsay Business Records

The quasi-servicer witnesses are merely computer jockeys. They look at screen shots of the computer software platform of data they did not enter and do not know who did… Nor did they watch any of the entries. The best question to ask is “what servicing software platform are you using?” It will open up a world of information.

It’s not the computer jockeys you want to depose. It’s the IT guys. How the software operates, exactly what and how it is entered and stored, and how it is linked to the foreclosure attorney firms for their access (and encrypted messaging) will provide a myriad of crucial information.

Judges think there a boxes of original files and documents being stored. What a hoot! All these “collateral” files contain are copies printed from the computer that are accessed by hundreds of people who also have the keys to make minimal to mega changes (alterations) to “original” scanned documents.

Judge: Wells Fargo to pay $8M for fraud tied to trust set up when Dallas woman was orphan

Not surprised are we?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

wells-fargo-hells-cargo

Wells Fargo Bank has been ordered to pay a Dallas woman more than $8 million by a state judge who concluded the bank defrauded her in serving as a trustee for a trust established by her relatives in Midland when she was orphaned at age 7.

In court filings and during a 2012 bench trial before State Judge Emily Tobolowsky, Angela Militello alleged that she had been deceived by Wells Fargo, which was acting as the trustee in a trust set up for her as a child. (The original complaint is here.)

Wells Fargo sent a trust officer to Dallas County in 1999 to discuss Militello’s trust, she alleged. At a Dallas restaurant, he informed her she needed to “open a new account” and produced papers for her to assign to create a revocable trust.

In 2006, following her divorce, Militello asked her trust officer how she might get $200,000 to  buy a house where she…

View original post 91 more words