Mortgage Acknowledgements: Can A Boo-Boo Be Fixed?

Unfortunately, in today’s world we are not dealing with “traditional” mortgages where a judge can reach into the archives of justice and apply common law. It appears NTMs are securities – even before signatures, witnessed or not.

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

Bank of America, N.A. v. Casey, 517 B.R. 1 (D. Mass. 2015) –

A Chapter 7 trustee sought to avoid a mortgage using “strong-arm” powers based on a defect in the acknowledgement. The mortgagee contended that the defect was cured by a subsequently recorded affidavit. The bankruptcy court found in favor of the trustee, and the mortgagee appealed.

View original post 742 more words

Hillary Clinton to Colbert, Says She’d Let The Banks Fail

At least she acknowledged their shareholders “know” …

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

“Yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.”

In her first appearance on Stephen Colbert’s “Late Show,” Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton took a firm stance against America’s big banks.

Clinton stopped by to chat about various aspects of her campaign, including her staunch support for a stable middle class and an increase to the minimum wage. She even let it be known what she and Bill like to binge-watch after 11-hour-long congressional hearings. (“The Good Wife,” “House of Cards” and “Madam Secretary.” Duh.)

When Colbert turned his questioning to Wall Street reform, he asked directly if Clinton were president, “and the banks are failing, do we let them fail?”

“Yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,” the former secretary of state responded. “Their shareholders have to know that yes, they will fail. And if they’re too big to fail, then under my plan and others that have been proposed they may have…

View original post 6 more words

Goldman Sachs to pay $50M fine over documents scandal

I guess the buck doesn’t stop at the top for responsibility. Whatever happened to knew or should have known?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

This time, the revolving door smacked Goldman Sachs on the backside.

Lloyd Blankfein’s bank is expected to pay a roughly $50 million fine and an ex-banker is expected to plead guilty to federal criminal charges that he took confidential documents from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, The Post has learned.

The civil penalties against Goldman are among the harshest ever levied by New York. The settlement is being ironed out between Goldman and the Department of Financial Services.

Read on.

View original post

Trick or Treat – Wall Street Modification Scams

image

Thank you Ellen Brown. See the latest: Killing Off Community Banks: Intended Consequence of Dodd-Frank?  https://www.laprogressive.com/killing-off-community-banks/

HAPPY HALLOWEEN!

[Infographic] More than one in three appraisals contain inconsistent property ratings

Okay – let’s dissect this. Appraisals were performed before the homeowner signed. The appraisals were used as an inducement to borrow against the property. Anybody see a connection here?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

39% of appraisals contained property quality or condition ratings that conflicted with previous ratings on the same property in the third quarter of 2015, according to a report from Platinum Data Solutions.

For the report, the company analyzed its database of over 300,000 appraisals that were evaluated by RealView, its appraisal quality technology, in Q3 2015.

This infographic shows what the company discovered.

(Source: Platinum Data Solutions)

“More than one in three appraisals contain inconsistencies in property ratings,” said Phil Huff, president and CEO of Platinum Data Solutions. “Causes aren’t easy to determine, so they need to be investigated. Doing this after Uniform Collateral Data Portal (UCDP) submission opens lenders up to numerous issues. Costly delays are just one of them.”

Read on.

View original post

Fla 4th DCA: The Starting Point is Standing — If You Don’t Have It, There is no Jurisdicition

In the old days (I sound like my mother now who would have been 100 next year), we didn’t need pre-stamped blank indorsements on notes. If a note and mortgage were sold the seller would indicate the sale to the buyer by signature and the buyer would record the transaction (if he were smart) in the land records office.

Think about it, when you sell a car you transfer the title – it all gets legally recorded in order to issue registrations, and of course taxes. That is by state law… And if it’s not recorded properly and the new owner has an accident, leaves the car on the side of the road, guess who is liable…? Why should property be allowed to float?! It’s about time the judiciary started to grasp the misappropriation of property. Just some of my thoughts, Sydney.

What’s really going on in default servicing? An insider’s perspective

Don’t you think this is pre-planned? Let’s face the facts – the so-called “original” collateral file ends up with the attorneys, who close their doors and conveniently dump all their documents…

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Mark Twain once said, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”

Well, for legal and compliance officers representing mortgage servicers who often cite concentration risk as a justification for maintaining an expansive network of legal service providers, it “just ain’t so.”

Ironically, it is this focus on concentration risk that leads to slower case resolution and increased servicing costs overall.

Risk is inherent in all litigation. There are direct financial risks such as legal fees, court costs and other expenses incurred due to attorney action or inaction (e.g., sanctions, opposing party legal fees, refiling fees associated with lack of prosecution dismissals), along with indirect risks such as extended resolution timelines and reputational harm.

Mortgage servicers too often ignore the real risk of law firm failure. This risk, now a recurring reality in the default servicing world…

View original post 57 more words