California Attorney Patricia Rodriguez: The Transferring of Servicing Rights to Avoid Reviewing Complete Modification Applications

The sale and movement of “servicing” is an area Congress has neglected to properly regulate. It’s bad enough that only servicing requires homeowner notification when its the sale, pledge, transfer, rehypothecation of the actual collateral that significantly effects the homeowner – and there is no notification requirement. IMHO the servicing requirement notification should include a copy of the agreements between the banks selling or transferring the servicing rights – it should be made public and accessible. We should know if the investor is in agreement and/or willing to have the servicing transferred or sold.

Think of it this way – what if the servicing is moved to an undesirable entity? Maybe the trust is not notified. However, if they are notified and the servicer is under investigation by the SEC or OCC then maybe the investor/Trustees should also be investigated, including “Fannie, as financial agent for the United States.” Maybe then we’d find out why there is so much servicing maneuvering.

Watchdog: HUD lacks sufficient oversight for borrower-financed down payment programs

Well, well, well – it only took 8 years to discover this…ahemmm!

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Report finds HUD “failed to adequately oversee” more than $16 billion in FHA loans

The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s lack of oversight into borrower-financed down payment assistance programs for Federal Housing Administration-insured loans puts borrowers and the FHA’s flagship insurance fund at “unnecessary risk,” HUD’s watchdog said in a new report.

According to the report from the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD “failed to adequately oversee” billions of dollars in loans that may have “questionable down payment assistance,” thereby putting the FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund at risk because of borrowers with higher than market interest rates.

Read on.

View original post

Deeds: Not All “Freebies” Are Fraudulent

Good information to know.

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

Rodriguez v. Nelabovige (In re Kirst), 559 B.R. 757 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2016) –

About a year before filing bankruptcy, a debtor conveyed his interest as a joint tenant in a residential property to his mother-in-law in consideration for $10. The chapter 7 trustee sought to avoid the conveyance as a fraudulent transfer.

View original post 872 more words

The Habitat for Humanity Scam – Disguised as a charity.

This ought to infuriate just about everyone… How much have we all in construction DONATED to Habitat for Humanity?! Well, let me shed some light on costs to build affordable housing, especially when there is so much labor donated. Separate the materials from the labor and materials will run about $36 -$42 psf on the high side. Full on licensed labor is usually less than $65 psf. Even if nothing is donated an entire affordable home would cost less than $100 psf. The larger the floor plan the less per square foot – it decreases.

What I found astounding, but not surprising is that Habitat for Humanity is in bed with Fannie Mae, of course… never miss a nickel or a chance to land grab, huh?

Fannie and Freddie employees.

Community Organizations Through partnerships at the community level, Fannie Mae is able to meet the needs of families in a far more direct and impactful way. We work with established organizations in communities across the country to prevent foreclosure, revitalize neighborhoods, address homelessness, and much more. For example, in 2011 we partnered with HomeFree-USA, local community and elected officials, and area mortgage servicers to open a Mortgage Help Center in Prince George’s County, MD, to help struggling homeowners in the Washington, DC area. (Read more about Fannie Mae Mortgage Help Centers on page 19 of this report.) Also, as a result of our long-standing partnership with Habitat for Humanity, Fannie Mae employee volunteers built and refurbished homes and properties in particularly hard-hit communities. See A Report on Fannie Mae’s Mission Activities

These guys would securitize their mothers! How horrendous is it to target the poor and then overcharge them for their fictitiously free home – and then have the kahunas to foreclose on these folks?!  Look in your land records office – these crooks even did 80/20 loans – and for someone who cannot afford a home any other way – that sure stinks like intent to tilt the homeowners right on into foreclosure.

Every state in the nation ought to sue the Habitat for Humanity organization, audit their books, follow the money and throw them out of the state! Deceptive advertising is the least of this – targeting the poor for the profits of securitization is morally corrupt;  nah, worse than that – morally and mentally bankrupt.

Gryphyn3's avatarfreedomsandtruth

Donation_Scam

It’s been a awhile since i posted anything, mainly because I was busy and as real life has a habit of doing, forces you to deal with it.  While I was dealing with life, I had spoken with a neighbor who asked that I sit in with a group of neighbors on the street to hear their story.   The people involved are homeowners who received their homes via Habitat for Humanity.

I’ve always thought of Habitat for Humanity as a good charity who helps people get a home, that they otherwise wouldn’t get.  And that was as a far I as I saw it.   I never went through the process they have, and didn’t dig much into how they operate. I assumed like most that this charity was good and my thoughts never went past that.

So I went and sat with the ten families on my street who…

View original post 1,775 more words

BofA CEO Moynihan Wants Changes to the Volcker Rule

It’s not like ol’ Brian ain’t worth more than BofA, ya know?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Bank of America (BAC) CEO Brain Moynihan believes it is the right time to introduce changes to the Volcker rule of the Dodd-Frank Act. Moynihan was speaking with Handelsblatt Global, a German language business newspaper published in Dusseldorf.

The Volcker rule is a federal regulation that keeps banks from conducting some investment activities using their own accounts. It also limits the banks’ ownership of and their relationships with hedge funds.

Read on.

View original post

Senate Adds Another Foreclosure Kingpin To Trump’s Cabinet

And this crook without a fight. Donations to political PACs pays off, huh?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

The Senate voted on Monday evening to confirm Wilbur Ross as secretary of commerce. The 79-year-old billionaire private equity investor is President Donald Trump’s 10th cabinet nominee to be confirmed, and remarkably, is the second member of Trump’s cabinet who was deeply involved in companies that swept up the housing crisis with foreclosures marred by document fraud like robo-signing.

The first, Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s treasury secretary, invested in and ran OneWest bank, which foreclosed on tens of thousands of Americans in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. During his Senate confirmation hearing, he denied that his bank used the illegal practice of robo-signing, but public documents obtained by The Columbus Dispatch showed that was a false statement.

Ross may not have been the CEO of a bank foreclosing on homeowners, but he was nevertheless intimately involved and invested in two companies that were accused of widespread wrongdoing. American…

View original post 105 more words

Foreclosures spike 18%

IMHO foreclosures abound because the majority of loan collateral went through Fannie and Freddie who, it appears, maintained an interest and guarantee, are the real party in interest and are still hiding debt.

Many of the homeowners we see were sucked into the Obama/Geithner HAMP scam and told they had to miss 3-4 payments in order qualify for the program. Once the payments were missed default was declared and modification was an abusive run-around for several years. Homeowners want to make payments – they are denied fair process. Fannie & Freddie want to dump the paper because it was their fault it was accepted in the first place – it appears they were complicit with the scheme, if not altogether the ring leaders.

If you have a BAC or BofA foreclosure and Assignment to either of them by MERS, or if you can’t find your loan in a trust (and even if it’s in one) Fannie or Freddie may be the real plaintiff…just hiding, complicit with being concealed.

Supreme Court breathes new life into whistleblower case against Wells Fargo

We should all be grateful to those that dedicate themselves to ensure justice and the Rule of Law remain alive and well.

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

With a ruling Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court revived a long-running whistleblower lawsuit that accused Wachovia’s investment bank of violating accounting rules and skirting internal controls to pursue short-term profits.

The Supreme Court vacated a judgment in August 2016 by the U.S. Appeals Court for the Second Circuit that had affirmed a lower court’s decision to dismiss the case filed by two whistleblowers, including one who had worked in Charlotte.

The high court ordered the appeals court to give the case further consideration in light of a June 2016 Supreme Court ruling that interpreted an aspect of the federal whistleblower law called the U.S. False Claims Act.

“It has obviously breathed new life into our case, which is very important for everyone involved,” said Joel Androphy, a Houston-based attorney representing the plaintiffs. “This has been a very long road.”

View original post

Sometimes You Have to Dig Deeper to Connect the Dots and Get to The Real Truth. Maybe PNC Never Really “Owned” the Loans?

United States District Court, E.D. California.
GENET HABTEMARIAM, Plaintiff,
v.
VIDA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC; US MORTGAGE RESOLUTION; PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants.

No. 2:16-cv-01189-MCE-GGH.
February 13, 2017.

pncSome three years later, PNC notified Plaintiff by mail that its SDOT was discharged, apparently due to a settlement agreement PNC had reached with various agencies of the United States government. PNC effectuated that cancellation by sending a 1099-C form approved by the Internal Revenue Service for cancelling a debt. Plaintiff received the Form 1099-C on or about June 29, 2010. According to Plaintiff, because the 1099-C cancelled the amount she owed on the second mortgage, she believed it legally released her from any further obligation to pay Continue reading →