SIGTARP HAMP FINDINGS: SERVICERS REVOKING COMPLIANT HAMP PLANS

Unknown's avatarLivinglies's Weblog

Why are modifications being undermined when they would so obviously preserve the value of the “loan?” The answer is because the real party in interest in the foreclosures is the servicer, not the trust, which doesn’t own the loan anyway, nor even the investor/beneficiaries, who reap very little out of the proceeds of foreclosure.

The servicer wants the loan to fail. The investor expects the servicer and trustee of the REMIC trust to make sure value is preserved. But that isn’t the game. If the property goes to foreclosure sale then the “servicer” can make its claim for “recovery” of “servicer advances.” The fact that “servicer advances” are made from a pool of funds established by investor money and the fact that the servicer accesses these funds to make payments, regardless of whether the borrower pays or not — all of that makes no difference in the game.

In that…

View original post 2,399 more words

Politics nothing to do with curbing big banks: Fed’s Kashkari

Times posted the same information – gotta love the line: “It’s not what one expects from a Goldman Sachs Republican.”

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

The newest Federal Reserve policymaker dismissed concerns that his call for radical action to rein in “too big to fail” banks was a partisan move, and instead said on Wednesday it highlighted the U.S. central bank’s independence from politics.

Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, a Republican and former Treasury official under the Bush and Obama administrations, said on Tuesday existing rules to protect taxpayers and the economy from a bank failure fall short, and he urged Congress to consider breaking up massive banks.

The call for action seven years after the worst of the financial crisis touched a nerve among bankers and on the combative presidential election campaign, where both Democrats and Republicans have hammered Wall Street greed and criticized regulations as having fallen short.

Read on.

View original post

U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Borrowers May Rescind Residential Mortgage Loans by Written Notice

This was the light in the tunnel, homeowners’ hope against the massive corruption. Justice Scalia stood by the letter of the law and for this we should all be grateful. Rest in peace Your Honor – you will be missed.

David Robinson's avatarMaine Republic Email Alert

COULD THE SUDDENESS OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SCALIA’S DEATH BE SOMEHOW RELATED TO THE LANDMARK SCOTUS RULING AGAINST MASSIVE FRAUDCLOSURES WRITTEN BY HIM?

By: Adam B. Brandon

The Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) requires lenders to make certain disclosures to borrowers before the parties close on a residential mortgage.  TILA also affords borrowers the right to rescind a mortgage for any reason for three day after the transaction.  Furthermore, if a lender fails to make the disclosures that TILA requires, then the borrower may rescind the transaction within three years or until the sale of the secured property, whichever comes first.

On January 23, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant opinion that clarifies how a borrower may exercise the right to rescind.  Previously, many federal courts required a borrower seeking rescission to file a declaratory judgment action.  If the borrower failed to file suit within three years, the…

View original post 580 more words

The Inaugural Financial Fraud Lemons of the Week Award Goes to DOJ

And who does the DOJ report to? Yeah.

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

fail1And I concur!

William K. Black
February 12, 2016     Bloomington, MN

The Bank Whistleblowers United announce the inaugural Financial Fraud Lemons of the Week award.  There can be no more fitting recipient than the ironically named Department of Justice (DOJ).  The “lemon” is used in the economics and criminology literature to refer to a car of surpassingly terrible quality.  The quality is so bad that the car can only be sold through fraud.  We will award it each week to an example of dishonesty or cowardice about financial fraud that is worthy of public ridicule.  We want to leave room in our scale for truly spectacular examples, so this first award will only receive Four Lemons.  The first award is for what has become a routine example of dishonesty and cowardice by DOJ.  Its conduct should be a scandal of national proportions, but by now everyone expects DOJ to…

View original post 9 more words

CEO Jamie Dimon bets on J.P. Morgan Chase, to the tune of $26 million

Maybe if he bought a billion dollars it might improved confidence… Now, if he really wanted to improve confidence he’d resign… (and turn himself in).

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Dimon bets the farm on the House of Morgan…

Chairman said to buy 500,000 shares to boost confidence in banking industry

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Chairman and Chief Executive James Dimon bought 500,000 of his bank’s shares on Thursday, a person familiar with the matter said.

The $26 million purchase is designed to stem the tide of negative sentiment overwhelming bank stocks this year. The big-ticket stock purchase from one of the country’s most well-known bankers followed a 20% decline in J.P. Morgan’s JPM, -4.41% share price so far this year and a broader selloff that has hit big banks such as Citigroup Inc. C, -6.50% and Bank of America Corp. BAC, -6.84% particularly hard.

Bank stocks have fallen about twice as much as broader stock-market averages this year as investors fret over slowing economic growth, falling energy prices and the possibility that interest rates will fall, a tough…

View original post 62 more words

Goldman Sachs subsidiary buys massive non-performing loan portfolio from Fannie Mae

So, they’re going to feed the chicks to the fox?! Figures. Look, we all should be screaming about this and individual states should not be so lazy. Make Fannie turn over delinquent loans to the state where the land resides. Give the states the opportunity to renegotiate with their citizens and collect the monthly payments or foreclose and make the funds the banks are getting from a free house. It as close as they’ll ever come to replenishing the pension funds they gambled away!

But giving away the properties to Goldman Sachs who helped orchestrate the demise of the economy is absolutely ridiculous.

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Fannie Mae announced Wednesday that it selected the winning bidders in its latest sale of non-performing loans, with a subsidiary of one of Wall Street’s biggest names among the winning bidders.

The total sale included four pools of loans that total $1.32 billion in unpaid principal balance spread across 6,540 loans.

The winning bidder for two of those pools, representing 2,068 loans that carry an unpaid principal balance of $418,414,683, was MTGLQ Investors, L.P., a “significant subsidiary” of Goldman Sachs.

According to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Goldman Sachs owns, directly or indirectly, at least 99% of the voting securities of MTGLQ Investors, L.P.

Read on.

View original post

MERSCORP HOLDINGS INC. GETS “BITCH-SLAPPED” BY CONNECTICUT SUPREMES!

“The most significant factor in the decline of the traditional residential mortgage model has been the development and evolution of the secondary mortgage market. A secondary market is created when the initial lender sells the mortgage loan to outside investors. Doing so provides local lenders with greater liquidity, which facilitates additional home buying, and also allows large outside investors to pool—and thus to minimize—the risk that any particular loan will go into default. Although the modern secondary mortgage market had its genesis in the creation of the Federal Housing Authority and associated government sponsored financing corporations such as Fannie Mae in the 1930s, it expanded dramatically in the 1980s with the advent of new types of mortgage backed securities for sale in the private equity markets.”

Do we have an admission here that NTMs exist? The current laws only address traditional mortgages. NTMs compared to traditional mortgages are Apples to Oranges, although they are both fruit they have different structures.

What happened to SIGTARP investigation into Freddie Mac official who died of apparent suicide

Worth refreshing our memories…

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

This is an article back in 2009 where Fannie Mac CFO committed suicide. It makes me wonder what happened to the probe as well Freddie Mac’s accounting practices and why this case remains unsolved and silent:

Police Investigating Death of Freddie Mac Official, Dead Of Apparent Suicide

WASHINGTON (AP) — The chief financial officer of money-losing mortgage giant Freddie Mac was found dead in his basement early Wednesday morning in what police said was an apparent suicide.

David Kellermann, 41, apparently hanged himself, said a law enforcement official familiar with the investigation. He asked not to be identified because the investigation was ongoing.

Kellermann’s death is the latest in a string of blows to Freddie Mac since it was seized by the government last September. The company, which owns or guarantees about 13 million mortgages, has been criticized for financing risky loans that fueled the real estate bubble and are…

View original post 420 more words

Freddie Mac to consumers: Here’s how to avoid mortgage fraud

Fannie and Freddie have had fraud detecting software for nearly 3 decades. Why was there so much fraud since the late 1990s? Because they wanted liquidity. Foreclosures (used to) make a lot more money than long term mortgage loans. The problem now is we know they had the means to catch fraud before it happened – there are numerous bank software patents indicating fraud defector devices… Now, how could millions of American homeowners all commit the same fraud? Right, it was systematically relaxed…not ignored… Intentionally altered by the banks. The banks knew or should have known that altering the safeguards would cause damage –

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Now this is a joke. Freddie Mac is educating consumers on mortgage fraud!

Housingwire:

As part of a continuing series that aims to educate consumers on all aspects of the home buying process, Freddie Mac released a short video that tells consumers how to avoid mortgage fraud when applying for a loan.

In the video, Freddie Mac identifies several “red flags” that consumer should be on the lookout for, including:

  • Being told to exaggerate your income, assets, credit, or provide false information someone says will help get the loan approved
  • Being pressured to sign paperwork that you haven’t had a chance to read or that you don’t fully understand
  • Being asked to release personal financial information online or over the phone by someone you don’t know

Last year, as a part of the same education effort, Freddie Mac issued a warning to buyers and lenders about scams that offer the…

View original post 59 more words