We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2026. All rights reserved.
Deadly Clear 
Been decade fraudelant and @WellsFargo still doing it the way they ask about hardship is nothing more than spying on our weaknesses and take advantage of our weaknesses for their benefit to take our 🏠
I agree. To apply for a hamp we had to write a hardship letter. We we’re not approved and given an ” in house” modification whatever that meant lol. Then when the bp oil spill devistated us again we applied for hamp again that’s when things went strange. People across America were told they needed to be 90 days late. I supposed The banks got greedy they wanted their pmi and then very out of town on the homeowner got a lawyer four the foreclosure ( no free house they would have to paylegal fee’s now)we are just a casino chip and the judfes are allowing this to continue. How can servicer#3 piggyback as substitute plaintiff on servicer#1&2 lforeclosure. Why don’t they have price standing at inception. This fakery is stealing money from people. After a decade you would think this would have crumbled already. 😦