Coming Home to Roost – Congressional Oversight Panel, “Banks cannot prove they own the loans…”

In the recent filing November 9, 2011 of an Ohio case, Deutsche v. Holden, in the Court of Common Pleas in Summit County, (Akron) Ohio, defense attorneys submit that the note had not been transferred pursuant to the PSA therefore the foreclosing entity (Deutsche) did not own the note and mortgage.

Holden‘s Motion to dismiss cites the November 16, 2010 Congressional Oversight Panel’s (COP) report titled “Examining the Consequences of Mortgage Irregularities for Financial Stability and Foreclosure Mitigation” as well as the PSA and New York trust law.

Senator Ted Kaufman warned that the COP investigation found evidence that he stated as the worse case scenario, “considerably grimmer” where “robo-signers served to conceal the fact the banks cannot prove that they own the mortgage loans that they claim to own.”

Holden cites the COP Report at page 19 stating:

“[I]n order to convey good title into the trust and provide the trust with both good title to the collateral and the income from the mortgages, each transfer in this process required particular steps. Most PSAs are governed by New York law and create trusts governed by New York law. New York trust law requires strict compliance with the trust documents; any transaction by the trust that is in contravention of the trust documents is void, meaning that the transfer cannot actually take place as a matter of law. Therefore, if the transfer for the notes and mortgages did not comply with the PSA, the transfer would be void, and the assets would not have been transferred to the trust. Moreover, in many cases the assets could not now be transferred to the trust. PSAs generally require that the loans transferred to the trust not be in default, which would prevent the transfer of any non-performing loans to the trust now. Furthermore, PSAs frequently have timeliness requirements regarding the transfer in order to ensure that the trusts qualify for favored tax treatment.”

Like most of the mortgage loan documents-to-trust manipulation, Holden’s assignment is 5 years too late.  The REMIC has failed.  Hopefully, Judge Cosgrove will mount the stallion of integrity and ride through Akron alerting the good folks of Summit County that Governments can no longer tolerate the use of misrepresentation, opaque, and confusing language in drafting, maintaining and executing financial instruments.

Clarity and precision are indispensable for the creation of credit and capital through paper. The foreclosure shall therefore be dismissed with prejudice.

Politicians must not forget what their greatest thinkers have been saying for centuries: All obligations and commitments that stick are derived from words recorded on paper with great precision.

Above all, governments should stop clinging to the hope that the existing market will eventually sort things out. “Let the market do its work” has come to mean, “let the shadow economy do its work.” But modern markets only work if the paper is reliable.

All documents and the assets and transactions they represent or are derived from must be recorded in publicly accessible registries. It is only by recording and continually updating such factual knowledge that we can detect the kind of overly creative financial and contractual instruments that plunged us into this recession.

Governments can also tighten and increase the penalties. You lie, misrepresent, mislead, commit fraud, aid & abet, fail to inspect and perform significant due diligence – you pay steep fines AND go to jail. Period. You fail to report or blow the whistle – you are an accomplice, you too pay fines and go to jail.

Mortgage-backed securities were KNOWN in the industry to have inflated property appraisals, systematically abandoned underwriting guidelines and over-rated bonds. These material misrepresentations were unknown to the borrowers and to the actual investors, the workers whose retirement and pension funds were gambled away. Broaden the securities laws to enable borrowers, whose collateral was inflated and used to bait investors, to file suit against the culprits for fraud.

“Government’s main duty now is to bring the whole toxic environment under the rule of law where it will be subject to enforcement. No economic activity based on the public trust should be allowed to operate outside the general principles of property law.

Financial institutions will have to serve society and fully report what they own and what they owe — just like the rest of us — so that we get the facts necessary to find our way out of the current maze.” (quoted from Hernando de Soto 2009).

Government can, and by all means should, regulate derivatives. Frankly, it’s not likely Americans (or the rest of the world for that matter) would even wince if a prison were to be built in the Marshall Islands and these banksters hauled off for 5-10 years. It certainly didn’t work to de-regulate them.

As always, please pass this post along to your friends and family – and of course to your friends in the judiciary.  Knowledge is powerful.

20 thoughts on “Coming Home to Roost – Congressional Oversight Panel, “Banks cannot prove they own the loans…”

  1. This is a great article. Perhaps you could comment on the (8) Summit County Judge’s effort to stop the abuse of the courts via fraudulent documentation by posting their ruling regarding a Certificate of Readiness. Judge Patricia Cosgrove was a signatory on this ruling:

    Click to access 1-certificate-of-readiness.pdf

    All of the Judges in Ohio and elsewhere need to emulate this effort to help bring integrity back into our court system.

  2. Pingback: “Banks Cannot Prove They Own the Loans . . . “ | AntiCorruption Society

  3. Pingback: Big Risk to buying Foreclosed home - City-Data Forum

  4. Pingback: Congressional Oversight Panel, “Banks cannot prove they own the loans…” « Livinglies's Weblog

  5. Pingback: Congressional Oversight Panel, “Banks cannot prove they own the loans…”

  6. Pingback: “Banks cannot prove they own the loans…” « squelch

  7. Pooling and servicing agreements show what SHOULD have happened… 8k, 10k, 424B5, and other relevant SEC filings, along with Bloomberg sourced Supplemental Trustee Monthly Reports Show what REALLY Happened.

  8. Now wouldn’t it be wonderful if the courts decided to refund the payments made by the mortgagors? If the contract was/is void, the payments were for what? The mortgagor could never establish equity if the mortgagee couldn’t pass clear title….

  9. Pingback: Question of the Week 11/27/2011 | Conorix

  10. Pingback: REALITY CHECK – SECURITIZATION FAIL! | Deadly Clear

  11. Pingback: WHOA Wells Fargo – Hawaii Halts Those Horses! | Deadly Clear

  12. Pingback: Oh, New Century…What a wicked web you weave… | Deadly Clear

  13. Pingback: Is Arrogant Bank Celebrity Jamie Dimon Too Big to Cuff? | Deadly Clear

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s