Bank of America to Defend Racketeering Claims

‘Bout damn time.

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

(CN) — Homeowners can sue Bank of America for claims it feigned compliance with a mortgage assistance plan that was a condition of the bank’s $45 billion bailout in 2008, the 10th Circuit ruled Monday.
Bank of America hired Urban Settlement Services dba Urban Lending Solutions to administer its Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP.
The bank was required to participate in HAMP as a condition of receiving a $45 billion bailout from the federal government to shore up the bank’s bad loans during the 2008 financial crisis. The government also guaranteed $118 billion in potential losses at the bank.
HAMP required Bank of America to collect financial information from at-risk borrowers, and evaluate their eligibility for a loan modification that would allow them to pay a lower interest on their mortgage.
The program allowed eligible borrowers to enter a trial period plan to demonstrate their ability to make lower…

View original post 39 more words

George Soros Hacked, Over 2,500 Internal Docs Released Online

Oh, this ought to be priceless. Hope Michael Perry (former IndyMac CEO) is following DeadlyClear – karma takes time. After NY Senator Chuck Schumer’s negative remarks about IndyMac, it started a “run” on the bank and Soros’ friends George Soros and Micheal Dell just happened to be in the wings to come in and buy the bank up from the FDIC. IMHO it appears Sen. Schumer ushered in the 2008 financial meltdown – which ultimately helped increase the wealth of his donor friends – one of which was George Soros. Are you smiling just a little bit, Mr. Perry?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Can be assessed on DCLeaks website.

View original post

Appeals Court Challenges Cal. Supreme Court Ruling in Yvanova/Keshtgar

Absolutely correct. And where in the trust does it give a trustee the power to sue? Many (or even most) of the trusts say that the Trustee has no liability or responsibility for the quality or performance of the underlying loans. It appears the process requires the servicer or seller to buy back the defective loan at face value in order to initiate a foreclosure.

Unknown's avatarLivinglies's Weblog

The Court, possibly because of the pleadings and briefs refers to the Trust as “US Bank” — a complete misnomer that reveals a completely incorrect premise. Despite the clear allegation of the existence of the Trust — proffered by the Trust itself — the Courts are seeing these cases as “Bank v Homeowner” rather than “Trust v Homeowner.” The record in this case and most other cases clearly shows that such a premise is destructive to the rights of the homeowner and assumes the corollary, to wit: that the “Bank” loaned money or purchased the loan from a party who owned the loan — a narrative that is completely defeated by the Court rulings in this case.

see B246193A-Kehstgar

It is stunning how lower courts are issuing rulings and decisions that ignore or even defy higher court rulings that give them no choice but to follow the law. These courts…

View original post 812 more words

Forbes: Fannie, Freddie Could Need as Much as $126 Billion in Crisis

Unknown's avatarLivinglies's Weblog

555 “[It was] the poverty caused by the bad influence of the English bankers on the Parliament which has caused in the colonies hatred of the English and . . . the Revolutionary War.” – Benjamin Franklin

Fannie and Freddie have reportedly been cash-cows for the federal government who have allegedly held the quasi-governmental guarantors hostage during eight-years of government receivership.   Fannie and Freddie have returned to the Treasury over $60 billion more than they received in the bailout. But the amount they owe to the government remains outstanding.  It is likely that the tax payer is being prepped to dole out another bail-out for the profitable GSE’s that insure trusts that are empty or no longer exist.

Fannie and Freddie are antiquated dinosaurs that contributed to the foreclose melt-down.  As nothing more than guarantors for empty trusts, they routinely attempt to foreclose on homes they don’t own and loans that…

View original post 546 more words

Do you want a National Mortgage Registry system?

Over 72 million families (based on 2.5 per household – that’s 180,000,000 constituents) have been negatively affected by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and its parent company MERScorp Holdings, Inc. Too many to count foreclosures have resulted over the past decade with forged assignments documents allegedly signed by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) employees who actually work for someone other than MERS.

Many of the homeowners who have bought a home or refinanced a home since 2002 will find Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. listed as the “nominee” mortgagee in their mortgages – and they don’t even know it. Now, the federal government is proposing a “National” mortgage registry system – and one would have to wonder why?

Please consider voting your opinion. 

Sorry you lost your home: Americans deserve more than an apology for the foreclosure fraud epidemic

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Despite talk of “recovery,” former homeowners remain scarred after their government abandoned them

DAVID DAYEN

“I lost my home of 30 years to fraudclosure.”

“I have been fighting this bank for over five years now. I am finally losing everything to their fraud.”

“We feel captive in our own home.”

This is a sampling of what I have awakened to practically every day for the past few months, since my book “Chain of Title: How Three Ordinary Americans Uncovered Wall Street’s Great Foreclosure Fraud” came out. Hundreds of people have emailed me, sent me letters, attended my public events, to relate their personal horror stories of foreclosure and dispossession. They come from across America, from different social and economic backgrounds. Some lost everything, and some haven’t given up.

They contact me, a non-lawyer who has only written about and not participated in their struggle, because they have been abandoned, by…

View original post 292 more words

Nearly 650,000 borrowers to receive more money from Independent Foreclosure Review

Maybe borrowers didn’t cash the checks because they realize the issues are bigger than the payola. Or maybe $2.18 wasn’t worth the time to cash or deposit.

Unknown's avatarLivinglies's Weblog

Nearly 650,000 borrowers to receive more money from Independent Foreclosure Review

The clock is now at zero for the borrowers eligible for payment under the Independent Foreclosure Review Payment Agreements who have not yet cashed or deposited their check, and their money is going to the borrowers who already cashed their checks.

As it said it would last year, the Federal Reserve Board announced Monday that any leftover money from the $3.9 billion set aside for borrowers as part of the Independent Foreclosure Review will go to borrowers who already received money because some borrowers took too long to cash their checks.

The Fed said last year that borrowers who had not cashed their check had until Dec. 31, 2015 to request a replacement check. Those borrowers then had until March 31, 2016 to cash their new checks.

Now that March 31 has come and gone, there’s still more…

View original post 300 more words

What Happened on Wall St. Ahead of the Crisis? We May Yet Find Out

New York Times
Street Scene
WILLIAM D. COHAN

db-streetscene-master768The eighth anniversary of the 2008 financial crisis is almost upon us, making this as good a moment as any to take stock of how little we know still about the bad behavior and deception that occurred inside the big Wall Street banks that helped to cause it — and how little we may ever know.

A wave of settlements between Wall Street and the Justice Department and regulators resulted in fines in excess of $200 billion flowing from the shareholders of these firms into the coffers of the various federal and state government entities. These payments still feel to me more like extortion than justice. After all, if the prosecutorial arm of the federal government that regulates you demands a 10- or 11-figure payment, it seems pointless to argue. Continue reading

Trump’s Big Economic Policy Address Is Short On Specifics, Other Than Help For Wealthy

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Huffington Post:

Trump’s campaign on Monday pulled down his old tax plan from his website, and replaced it with the text of his Detroit speech. The original plan would have capped income taxes at 25 percent and long-term capital gains and dividends at 20 percent, while adding $12 trillion to the national debt.

In its place, Trump offered the same basic ideas, with some slightly shifted details. More details, he said, would be provided “in the coming weeks.”

He also offered some of his usual refrains: Trump lamented that the country had strayed from an “America First” policy; bemoaned that skyscrapers had been built in Beijing and refugees had been accepted into the U.S.; and called the unemployment rate a hoax.

“All of our policies should be geared towards keeping wealth inside the United States,” he said.

Trump is struggling in the polls after spending the last several days insulting…

View original post 12 more words

MERS game changer? Connecticut Supreme Court upholds new fee on lending industry

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

States long imposed fees to record documents in land records.

The Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems loan registry system, created in the mid-1990s, meant lenders no longer needed to record security interest assignments in county land records each time they transferred a promissory note.

As a result, many counties sued MERS to force MERS members to record future security interest assignments and recover fees they claimed were “lost” because MERS members stopped recording assignments. MERS won the large majority of these cases.

[Note: Read HousingWire’s extensive chronicle of MERS proceedings, 600+ pieces of content, by clicking here.]

Connecticut tried a different tack to recover these alleged “lost” fees:  it amended the state’s land records statute to impose higher fees on mortgages for loans registered with MERS.  MERS filed suit to challenge the constitutionality of the statue, but in a February 2016 decision captioned MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. v. Malloy, the…

View original post 35 more words