Cramdown Plan of Reorganization: Can A $2400 Tail Wag An $8.6 Million Dog?

FNMA wouldn’t have had an underwater asset had it not allowed (and promoted) inflated appraisals. The debtor relied upon the bank’s appraisal of the asset. The bank orders and hires the appraiser – not the borrower. It is a well known fact that banks intentionally inflated appraisals (a claim in almost every investor lawsuit and acknowledged by the appraisers’ association). The 2008 crash, which realized deflated real estate values, did not happen because the mortgaged real estate values were real figures. It happened because the banks mortgaged inflated real estate figures. In many cases real estate was inflated well over 200% of its actual value. Whatever the debtor’s real estate was valued today would likely reflect the value at the time of the original mortgage.

In bankruptcy debtors should be allowed to bring an AP and establish the appraised value prior to any mortgage after 2000. A 3%-6% value increase per year would be acceptable. Any unreasonable appraised inflated value used by the bank to establish loan value above a reasonable yearly increase should be allowed to be stripped in lieu of the fraud committed by the lenders.

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

Village Green I, GP v. Fed. Nat’l. Mortgage Ass’n. (In Re Village Green I, GP), 811 F.3d 816 (6th Cir. 2016)

The debtor sought confirmation of a plan of reorganization where the impaired accepting class consisted of two claims totaling less than $2400 which were to be paid over 60 days. The secured creditor objected that this did not satisfy the Bankruptcy Code confirmation requirements. The bankruptcy court initially confirmed the plan. After bouncing back and forth between the bankruptcy court and the district court, the case was dismissed and the automatic stay lifted. An appeal to the 6th Circuit followed.

View original post 691 more words

Couple sues JP Morgan after they can’t access safe deposit

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

NY Post:

A Long Island couple’s safe deposit box is so secure, even they can’t get into it, they say in a lawsuit.

Brenda and Robert Fox have kept $48,000 in jewel­ry in a box at a Chase Bank in Huntington since 2009.

The Foxes had no trouble with the setup until last year, when Brenda was told there was no record of her owning the box.

Even after a supervisor opened it with Brenda’s key, managers declined to let her have the belongings inside because recently computerized records listed a different owner, the Foxes say in Brooklyn federal court.

View original post

Senate Dems say Wells Fargo not responding to fraud info requests

Eight years they’ve had to investigate the charges that over 40 million of their constituents have been suffering from. And what do they do? Nothing, until someone else – not from their cabal, comes into power. NOW and only now they want to be proactive. Give me a break!

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

U.S. Senate Banking Committee Democrats sent another letter to Wells FargoWFC, +0.07%   on Thursday, asking why their other letters have not yet been answered.

The bank’s management has so far failed to answer all the questions the committee members have put to it, the letter says, following its settlement with multiple regulatory authorities in September for multi-year fraudulent sales practices.

The letter, jointly signed by nine Democrats including Ranking Member Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, again asked Wells Fargo’s board for a status report on its ongoing investigation of the fraud and a detailed timeline of when the board learned about the illegal practices and actions it took. They also asked why the board didn’t investigate the misconduct sooner.

The senators say Wells Fargo’s management is dodging them, even though its new CEO Tim Sloan told CNBC on October 12 that there were…

View original post 18 more words

The Italian Banking Crisis: No Free Lunch – Or Is There?

“To avoid the moral hazard of bank malfeasance in the future, the banks could then be regulated so that they were harnessed to serve the public interest, or they could be nationalized. This could be done without cost to the government, since the NPLs would have been erased from the books.”

Ellen Brown's avatarWEB OF DEBT BLOG

It has been called “a bigger risk than Brexit”– the Italian banking crisis that could take down the eurozone. Handwringing officials say “there is no free lunch” and “no magic bullet.” But UK Prof. Richard Werner says the magic bullet is just being ignored. 

On December 4, 2016, Italian voters rejected a referendum to amend their constitution to give the government more power, and the Italian prime minister resigned. The resulting chaos has pushed Italy’s already-troubled banks into bankruptcy. First on the chopping block is the 500 year old Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (BMP), the oldest surviving bank in the world and the third largest bank in Italy. The concern is that its loss could trigger the collapse of other banks and even of the eurozone itself.

There seems little doubt that BMP and other insolvent banks will be rescued. The biggest banks are always…

View original post 1,642 more words

Avoiding Mortgages: How Far Does a Bona Fide Purchaser Have To Go in Searching Records?

Trust – but verify. Every judge has his own take on these matters… and of course, his own investments to consider.

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

Wenzel v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC (In re Wenzel), 554 B.R. 861 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 2016)

A chapter 7 trustee and a debtor sought to avoid as a preference a mortgage assignment that was recorded within 90 days prior to the bankruptcy filing. Underlying this claim was their contention that the original mortgage was void as against subsequent purchasers (thus allowing the trustee to avoid the lien) because no legal description was attached to the mortgage.

View original post 777 more words

Falling Into the Traps Set By the Banks

The beginning of Fake News promulgated by the banks setting up the dynamics early in the failing game with the national media (that they owned with over-leveraged debt deals) by labeling “liars loans” and “deadbeat borrowers” to place the blame for their fraudulent enterprise on the homeowners. The banks knew their scheme and bubble would fail and rather than expose the truth they made sure the public’s first (and lasting) impression was that it was
the homeowners’ fault because they bought homes they couldn’t afford.

The truth in fact was that if the banks hadn’t crashed the economy, gambled away (lost) the pension funds that caused businesses to close, bankrupt, layoff thousands of employees, and destroy the construction industry… not to mention municipalities and states struggling with the loss (3.4 TRILLION dollars) of their employees pension and retirement funds, there would no need to create fake news stories to predispose public opinion in advance of the crisis.

Unknown's avatarLivinglies's Weblog

For the past 15 years there has been a huge chasm between what a document says and what actually occurred. In foreclosure settings, the conscious decision has been made to ignore the Truth and proceed on the falsehoods promulgated by the banks. This arises from the “national security” fear that if the banks are not allowed to continue their fraudulent behavior, the entire financial system will collapse taking the entire society down with it. This myth is promulgated by the Banks, who supply the government with people to regulate the banks. Even as a theory it is untested, and unsupported by any real evidence. Unfortunately for Americans, too many people believe it.

Listen to the last Last Neil Garfield Show at http://tobtr.com/s/9673161

Get a consult! 202-838-6345

https://www.vcita.com/v/lendinglies to schedule CONSULT, leave message or make payments.
 
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY…

View original post 1,252 more words

Senate Dems put up a website for OneWest foreclosure victims to tell their stories

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

On November 30th, 2016, President-elect Trump named Steve Mnuchin to be the United States Treasury Secretary.

Also known as the “Foreclosure King,” Mnuchin earned the nickname for his bank’s practice of buying distressed mortgages during the financial crisis and evicting thousands of homeowners.

As the Chief Executive Officer and owner of OneWest Bank, Mnuchin oversaw what housing advocates called a “Foreclosure Machine.”

How did the “Foreclosure Machine” work?
The “Foreclosure Machine” repossessed the homes of tens of thousands of American families between 2009 and 2015. These actions only intensified the economic pain of the Great Recession.

Programs were created and available specifically to help banks like OneWest work with families to modify their mortgages and keep them in their homes.

Instead, OneWest pursued an aggressive strategy of foreclosing on families to rack up profits. In one case in Minnesota, a homeowner in a foreclosure dispute with OneWest came home in…

View original post 41 more words

New “Original Notes” from Visionet Systems: How False Original Signatures Are Created

The computer software used to accomplish this corruption was intentionally created. The intent is in the patented software systems. Just because a patent is filed in the USPTO doesn’t mean its a legal operation.

Unknown's avatarLivinglies's Weblog

reapplying the “signature images” upon stored copies.”

I have obtained confirmation from a large bank vendor (Visionet Systems, Inc.) that it rectifies “lost notes” by reapplying the “signature images” upon stored copies. —- Bill Paatalo, December 10, 2016

Kudos to Bill Paatalo who has quantified and identified what I have been talking about for years — the production of “original” notes that were previously destroyed. The sarcasm from the bench has dripped ridicule on anyone even suggesting that the “blue ink” signature is merely a reproduction on a fabricated document. The revelations in this article might be a step toward changing that attitude. — Neil Garfield

Get a consult! 202-838-6345

https://www.vcita.com/v/lendinglies to schedule CONSULT, leave message or make payments.
 
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER.
—————-
see

“Automated Affidavit Verifications” And “Lost Note” Reproductions. For…

View original post 1,064 more words