Federal regulators expressed ‘no confidence’ in Wells Fargo CEO

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

That’s probably why Sloan said peace out to his job..

At least three of Washington’s most powerful regulators had expressed “no confidence” in Wells Fargo’s CEO, Tim Sloan, in the weeks leading up to his abrupt resignation Thursday, The Post has learned.

There was a “regulatory push” led by the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. — three of the bank’s principal regulators — to oust Sloan from his perch at the bank in recent weeks, according to a person briefed on the matter.

“There were multiple regulators voicing no confidence,” the person said of the OCC, the Fed and the FDIC.

Bryan Hubbard, a spokesman for the OCC, declined to comment but directed The Post to an open consent order it has with the bank, from April 2018, allowing it to “provide additional guidance” on senior executive officers and board members.

View original post 2 more words

Bye Felicia! Wells Fargo CEO Tim Sloan abruptly steps down

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

Wells Fargo announced Thursday that the embattled Sloan is relinquishing his post as CEO and president of the megabank and stepping down immediately.

According to the bank, Sloan is retiring as CEO, president, and board member on June 30, 2019, but his retirement is taking immediate effect.

The bank said that C. Allen Parker, who currently serves as the bank’s general counsel, will now take over as interim CEO, president, and member of the board.

Read on.

View original post

Common Sense Prevails: SCOTUS Broadens Primary Liability for Fraudulent Schemes

Source: Common Sense Prevails: SCOTUS Broadens Primary Liability for Fraudulent Schemes

“BUT you still need to prove intent to lie along with the other elements of fraud. A lie is not actionable if the recipient knew it was untrue or should have known or did not rely upon it. If the lie is not material then it is presumed to belie upon which nobody relied.”

The intent is found in the USPTO patents and algorithms. Dissect the reasoning for patents. NEW ideas/inventions. Traditional mortgages are not new. Securitization / rehypothecation with intended foreclosure scheme gave the banks grounds for patented procedures.

Fraud detection was built into underwriting software, which allowed the program to obtain patent. It was intentionally relaxed.

Avoiding Mortgages: What Happens When A Stranger to The Transaction Files a Discharge in Error?

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

Kelley v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (In re Bowers), 595 B.R. 869 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2018) –

A chapter 7 trustee sought to avoid a security deed based on the fact that as of the petition date satisfactions of the security deed had been recorded. The secured party contended that its security interest was still enforceable because the satisfactions had been recorded in error, and alternatively asked for equitable recognition of its interest by subrogation or reinstatement.

View original post 1,017 more words

Why Homeowners Should Win Foreclosures: It’s the Moral Thing to Do.

“They should fail because all of them have received a benefit and some of them have received a windfall derived from trading on the borrower’s signature on the note and mortgage in an amount far exceeding the principal amount loaned.”

The reason why thousands of cases have been confidentially settled with satisfactions of mortgages, payment of attorney’s fees and damages is that the banks are willing to pay anything necessary to preserve the tree (certificates) and the branches (derivatives) and the leaves (minibonds and contracts like credit default swaps). The risk to the investment bank…

Source: Why Homeowners Should Win Foreclosures: It’s the Moral Thing to Do.

If you think foreclosures are a thing of the past, think again

In order to maintain the illusion of legality and an orderly marketplace the banks and their servicers must continue to push foreclosures even if it means going after people who are not actually withholding payments. The legacy of the mortgage meltdown and the brainless government policies that let the banks get away with what they…

”The courts don’t want to hear about esoteric arguments about the securitization process.” How can the judges or any lawmaker refuse to discuss securitization? It happens to be at the core of the [mortgage] transaction, established and in place before the faux mortgage and note documents were even drafted.

Source: If you think foreclosures are a thing of the past, think again