We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2025. All rights reserved.
> On top of that government employees that are not prepared properly – doesn’t that qualify for a Title 42 sec. 1983 lawsuit?
No. § 1983 applies to constitutional / civil rights violations committed by State government officers / agents / employees that injury individual people & you’d have to prove an “injury”. In other words, it’s not enough to allege that certain gov’t. employees didn’t do their jobs properly, were negligent, incompetent, whatever, you’d have to show how YOU were injured by their actions made “under color of state law”. For example, a law-enforcement officer beating someone who’s already in handcuffs 1/2 to death, or shooting an unarmed person who posed no threat — the injured individuals could file suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for actions like that. There are many, many more, but a bank officer who didn’t know the law about money laundering isn’t one of ’em.