We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2025. All rights reserved.
We have been saying that they should have demanded a audit on these trust to see the truth.
Sent from my iPhone
>
Investors is going to recoop as much as they can from the big banks. Homeowners should be suing the banks over LIBOR. There is currently a case in NY of a class action by homeowners on LIBOR. That case is still pending. And of course, NY AG is suing banks over LIBOR. Suing over LIBOR is very differcult in the US since LIBOR is a benchmark rate in London. This country as well as globally created a big financial mess that differcult to fix when they allow securitization of any financial products to be deregulated. They need to end securitization, bringthe Glass-Steagall Act in the U.S., regulate REMICs to suspend the bank licenses of banks in which those that don’t transfer mortgage backed securities properly into the trusts within the 90 day guidelines.
Guess we should reblog https://deadlyclear.wordpress.com/2012/07/27/eliot-spitzer-every-person-whose-interest-rate-depended-on-libor-is-a-victim/
This has been DC’s mantra since LIBOR became an issue!