We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2026. All rights reserved.
i got foreclosed, took the bank, mers and the attorney harmon law office to court. in the end i lost because i was pro se and chase hired one of boston’s top attorneys to represent them.
here’s the thing, evidence means nothing in a court of law, it is all about procedure, and if you are pro se what do you know about procedure.
i had all the signatures, i had an affidavit from andrew harmon claming the robo signature was in fact his, signed with his real signature which i had sourced on the mortgage documents to his family home.
i had a mortgage blank endorsed.
i had a notarized letter from a registar of deeds proclaiming that the assignment of mortgage was fraudulent.
in 5 years in court including the superior court, appeals court, an appeal to a single justice of the supreme court and the brockton housing court not a single shred of the evidence i exhibited in my defense (housing court) and as a plaintiff (superior court etc) was ever looked at.
from the courts perspective because i had not followed court procedure all my evidence was inadmissible.
my advice to pro se defendants or plaintiff’s is beware of “failure to state a claim”
i guess i can’t complain, i had a good run of it, 5 years against everything chase, mers, harmon law and the trial court of the commonwealth could throw against me.
remember the court is not your friend, regardless of what the judge tells you they do not welcome pro se types into their court room. your chances of winning in a court room are directly proportional to the size of your bank balance.
ps: i have added the website foreclosure prevention guide for anyone who is interested in andrew s harmon’s signatures, no other reason, not looking for google juice.