We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2025. All rights reserved.
Deadly Clear 
A dismissal without prejudice is a temporary delay, at best. The bank can always come back with a new suit. It is dismissal WITH prejudice that stops them cold. To do that, see if you can pile up several successive failures. Failure to respond to an admission request in which you declare ALL of their faults is wonderful because after 30 days of unresponsiveness, the admissions become “ADMITTED” and your case is already won before a trial ever begins. Failure to produce and failure to answer interrogatories and the big one, failure to obey a court order, especially an order to compel of some kind. Just imagine that instead of jumping on each failure one at a time, you quietly bide your time and let each item go unanswered. Then go into court on a motion to involuntarily dismiss based on flagrant and egregious disregard for compliance with any of the discovery mechanisms. At that point, the judge will hit them with the gavel instead of his desk and you should easily get your coveted dismissal with prejudice. Then move for costs and cancellation of the lis pendens for good measure, followed by your own new suit for quiet title. If you can afford to wait, wait until the Statute of Limitations has expired. There are other nails to be driven into the quiet title coffin as well, so if you want to know what they are, an email to griffinmgmt@gmail.com will get you that info as well.