We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2025. All rights reserved.
Deadly Clear 
OK. We have the second case going… he’s already asking for summary judgment. A true tool and a very bad lawyer to boot. No names mentioned of course. YOU KNOW. And… we went to the Courthouse and MOTIONS WERE MISSING FROM THE FILE AND FILED NI THE WRONG FILE. BOTH circumstances. We immediately noticed this because our first Motion asking the court to investigate ROTHFUSS was FAT. ALSO… in FLORIDA when they got David Stern disbarred that was the result of Judges filing bar complaints and providing testimony and affidavit. You won’t find THAT in Pike County. Also … I doubt you found it in Henry. And by all appearances you did not. We will ask to recuse this judge over the missing Motions, failure to force counsel to ANSWER our motions and other negligence. The MC in DT Pikeville keeps a stringer FOR ROTHFUSS and others in her office AND it also seems a huge conflict of interest that the MC also is an attorney involved in land deeds and other matters relating to real property.
HOW can that be LEGAL??
OK I need to know this asap. Has anyone in this mess or yourself or Glenn Augenstein or ANYONE ELSE you talk to been threatened with arson while they are being illegally foreclosed on? These overt threats of arson arrived in the same fashion and with a few addendums BY THE SAME GROUP who threatened our brakes not long back.
The thing is that this now IRREVOCABLY TIES THEM TO THE PATTERN SET IN TAMPA FLORIDA WHERE THEY TERRORIZED US FROM OUR HOME. Please please spread this far and wide. I would like to know if anyone else has been threatened with arson !!
Politicians are ALL irrelevant and pointless. With few sterling exceptions and I see almost none on the horizon.
Also he actually ADMITS his motions are ‘somehow’ missing from the Court file. Again he responds to things that only EXIST ON OUR DEVICES. NOT SERVED YET which he also admits… and I’ll tell you WHY.. it was DUMPED OFF AT OUR MAILBOX after we mailed it … NO MARKINGS AT ALL EXCEPT FOR MUD… clearly ADDRESSED TO LSR yet dumped off at our mailbox IN THE MUD…
Oh maybe that top comment was the pre-cursor to the arson threats. They occurred Tuesday and today Thursday. We were gone all day Wednesday on YET ANOTHER expensive MISSION caused by this ‘law’ firm. This PROFESSIONAL LEGAL ASSn.
yup. maybe. I left that comment. The arson threats started the next morning. This is NOT an isolated act on their part. They know that the stringer is VERY problematic. THE stringer ADVISES YOU to PAY THE AMOUNT DEMANDED. Despite you do NOT OWE IT. I will never hand a dime to someone unless it’s love or I am paying them…. or because they look like they need it more than I do and are otherwise incapable of having it … none of these apply in this case. It’s my opinion that this is marginally legalized extortion.