We reserve the right to edit, classify or refuse to publish any material submitted by a comment and/or information provider. While we take every precautionary measure to prevent inappropriate, inflammatory material we cannot rule-out such stray incidents. We request all the users to maintain proper decorum and let us continue and excel in providing this interaction service to our community.
We are a consortium of legal professionals, paralegals and journalists. We are not all attorneys. We do not play one on TV. Nothing in this entire blog should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice you should consult an attorney.
PAID ENDORSEMENT DISCLOSURE: In order for us to support the blogging activities, we may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
DeadlyClear advocates for transparency and accountability in an effort to preserve the rights guaranteed to the press under the First Amendment and strengthen the public’s right to know.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate and HarvestRight™ Affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase a product or service with the links we provide, we may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you for those associate links and your support helps us to provide free content on our websites.
DeadlyClear® is a product of Project Maui, Inc., a Hawaii corporation. Copyright 2012-2025. All rights reserved.
Deadly Clear 
I would like to know what your feeling is on this matter, i have a full copy of my closing docs from nov 8 2005, we didnt have one , so
in 2013 i went to closing attorney office, lucky he said he found the complete file, he instructed the secretary to make a full and complete copy of all docs in file. she did. in the file there were paperwork that i never sew before. the closing instructions from bank, and what needed to be done, before funding could be approved. now i would like to know why would a bank want ( 3 ) certified copys of my note, and the original note, given them 4 sign mortgage notes. ??? so now there are 4 mortgage notes out there somewhere.
also in the docs was the copy of the wire transfer from REAL PARTY THAT FUNDED THE LOAN. and it was not the name on the mortgage or note. also there was a copy of my note in the paperwork, and it was stamp/sign-endorsed to the same funder of money, sign over without recourse, and this is not a stamp signature, or date . its a real signature and dated the same day we sign are mortgage and note? now 8 days later the money came in on our refi. the check was from attorney check book, and attorney checking account i would say, if it was his account. right.
so the question becomes this. who should of been put on at my registry of deeds office, if the note was signed over without recourse to this other bank.??because the name was the same as who was on mortgage and note at time of signing. the same bank/orignator that sign it over the same day of closing to this other bank??
david a belanger
978-618-3105
just a note, on rescission. this tuesday i will talking to my lawyer on this issue, as i did rescind,sent out letters and now i haven’t hurd anything from them for 3 months, except for a email that they accepted the rescission. my lawyer say we will be asking them if this is what they really meant. i told my lawyer he say nothing to them. because by operation of law. it done. they had 20 days to respond and file in court if they disagreed with the rescission. right?