Mortgage Enforcement: Dot Those “i”s and Cross Those “t”s – Or Else

Luckily, the Debtor apparently had a competent attorney.

BankruptcyRealEstateInsights's avatarBankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights

In re Demers, 511 B.R. 233 (Bankr. D. R.I. 2014)

A chapter 13 debtor objected to the portion of a mortgagee’s claim consisting of expenses related to foreclosure of its mortgage. She argued that since the mortgagee failed to comply with notice requirements under the mortgage, the foreclosure expenses were not valid.

View original post 693 more words

Leave a comment