PHOENIX LIGHT SF LIMITED vs CREDIT SUISSE AG | NYSC – investors are only now becoming aware that, while they thought they were purchasing “mortgaged-backed” securities, in fact they were purchasing non-mortgagedbacked securities

Maybe now they are realizing that as investors they were only leasing the revenue stream. Does that make them owners or even holders?

justiceleague00's avatarJustice League

PHOENIX LIGHT SF LIMITED vs CREDIT SUISSE AG | NYSC – investors are only now becoming aware that, while they thought they were purchasing “mortgaged-backed” securities, in fact they were purchasing non-mortgagedbacked securities

Trusts are unable to foreclose on loans because they cannot prove they own the mortgages, due to the fact that defendants never properly transferred title to the mortgages at the closing of the offerings. Moreover, investors are only now becoming aware that, while they thought they were purchasing “mortgaged-backed” securities, in fact they were purchasing non-mortgagedbacked securities.

Here is the court document:

http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/PHOENIX-LIGHT-SF-LIMITED-vs-CREDIT-SUISSE-AG.pdf

View original post

Leave a comment